How do we discuss controversial topics? More importantly, how often do we LEARN about how to discuss and LISTEN to an argument?
Often, it seems, we rely upon superficial research of the facts, intimidation, or appeals to emotion. Yet, democracy depends on citizens charitably and accurately engaging each other’s arguments.
In this workshop, we introduce
argument mapping: a simple, powerful, research-backed method for applying logical rigor to writing and classroom discussions. Visualizing the structure of arguments makes students more precise, confident thinkers across disciplines. Harvard philosophers have partnered with social studies teachers to develop and test this method with students. Attending teachers will be provided tools, resources, and best practices that can be implemented immediately to support student learning.
Aligning with dimensions of the
C3 Framework, argument mapping can help your students develop critical reasoning skills by:
- Structuring their thinking using a visual method that organizes claims into a hierarchy of support relationships
- Evaluating the quality of an argument by (1) evaluating premises (evidence) for truth or reasonableness; and (2) evaluating the strength and weakness of support relationships
This process helps students not just weigh evidence, but analyze whether that evidence adequately supports the logical structure that is at the heart of any argument, whether found in an essay, speech, editorial or other source vital to civic discourse.
